Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Commentary on Mill’s On Liberty Chapter 5: Is Mill’s Liberty Realistic?

Mill strongly enforces his view of liberty, one in which an individual should have complete freedom to act as he sees fit as long as those actions do not harm other individuals, by use of examples and applications of said liberty. However, in this final chapter of On Liberty, he particularly focuses on counterexamples where such liberties may need to be somewhat restricted in order to promote a general freedom for an individual such as economic relationships and the use of government to support and protect such liberty without violating such liberty. In the example involving economics, Mill demonstrates that limiting businesses such as gambling houses for the sake of restricting bad and corrupting businesses. Furthermore, he believes that governments should indeed, while allowing people to learn from their mistakes prevent others from being harmed by them through use of a police force, one which, like the government granting it power, uses force as a last measure at first utilizes the options of “advice, instruction, and persuasion”. While this may seem inconsistent and an improper imposition of the majority of society’s social values upon individuals and individual enterprises, after careful consideration we can see how these counterexamples actually strengthen Mill’s account of Liberty.                                                                                                                                                                                                                 


First, such examples might show a depth of Mill's theory that was not previously apparent. Indeed, this is why Mill provides a chapter on applications of his theory. In fact, these examples reinforce the points that while society must not punish behavior, it does not have to actively promote vices.  While it is also possible that Mill’s examples simply overlook certain logical fallacies, it is also possible that he promotes certain interventions, such as those involving gambling houses and police, for the sake of allowing individuals to have access to other previously less available activities, while nevertheless being free to take part in gambling or crossing a dangerous bridge that police recommend not crossing.                                                                                                                                                                                                            


On that note, Mill ends the chapter by saying while the aforementioned examples show that action is effective for a governing body in society, inaction is just as important. A society that allows to people to develop a capacity for choice and have the freedom to make mistakes is the society that will make true progress. However, such a society must emerge from an open culture, one free from conformity and designed not for temporary accommodations but ultimately to create a better future. Whether the future that Mill envisioned is the present we are living in now….well that’s certainly another argument altogether, one which I will take the liberty to decline for now.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.