Conclusion: Some Cartesian propositions
like that of complete doubt, have failed to achieve certainty. These consequences serve as a further test to
that uncertainty.
“These propositions cannot be regarded
as certain; and, in order to bring them to a further test, it is now proposed
to trace them out to their consequences. We may first consider the first alone...”
(230.)
Premises:
1.Cartesian
philosophy begins with absolute universal doubt (228).
a. we are unable to obtain knowledge
from looking within ourselves (230).
b. all knowledge is to be derived
from external facts
2.
Total skepticism is not a good start in the study of philosophy (228).
a. facts previously in place are
there because it was agreed upon without a reason to
question
(228).
b. doubt should arise with reason to
doubt (229).
c. those who follow Cartesian philosophy
are trying to restore beliefs previously released,
rendering it counterproductive
(228).
3.
Acceptance of this proposition forces us to discard of all knowledge of the
external world based on our self-consciousness (230).
a. diversity and multiple viewpoints
will be disregarded and a single mode favored to
maintain uniformity in the
study.
4.
A single mode of action of consciousness is to be chosen to utilize logically
when
interpreting the external world (230).
a. the chosen mode is to be
reliable, unquestionable and what most closely resembles
external facts (230).
4.
This proposition limits greatly not only the knowledge we have thus far
acquired but the knowledge we are still seeking.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.